Nikon capture nx-d vs viewnx 2 free -

Nikon capture nx-d vs viewnx 2 free -

Looking for:

Nikon Japan abandons ViewNX 2, ViewNX-i, Capture NX2 and Capture NX-D completely - DIY Photography. 













































   

 

Nikon capture nx-d vs viewnx 2 free. What is the different between all these Nikon software?



 

The advantages of Camera Raw versus ViewNX-i are quite similar to those of Capture NX-D as listed on the previous page, so rather than recapping, let's take a look at how Nikon's two apps differ, instead.

ViewNX-i has a more modal interface akin to that of, say, Adobe Lightroom, with separate tabs for image browsing, editing, a map view and a web tab giving access to Nikon Image Space or YouTube. Also lining the top of the screen are big, obvious buttons for things like importing or converting images, editing movies, printing or creating contact sheets and slideshows, and sending images by email or to web services.

Capture NX-D, by contrast, has a non-modal interface centered around image browsing and editing, first and foremost, and most of the buttons at the top of its interface are aimed at those tasks. But there's much more control over image editing in particular, albeit with a rather frustrating user interface which make for an unnecessarily steep learning curve. We'll come back to that in a moment.

These include:. In use, though, it's surprising just how disorganized and confusing it feels when compared to ACR. Local and global adjustments have separate tabs in the right-hand panel, identified only by icons. The local adjustment tab is logical enough, but the tab for global adjustments is extremely cluttered and takes quite some figuring out.

It's topped by five dropdowns for things like stored adjustments, exposure compensation, white balance and more. Alongside are icons which vary from straightforward to near-meaningless, above six more icons which lack dropdowns. Clicking on any of these icons changes their color, and simultaneously calls up more sub-panels beneath. What's in these sub-panels can differ significantly from what's available through the dropdowns.

Even more confusingly, while most of these sub-panels can be opened at the same time, that's not always true. Only one from the adjustments, exposure compensation, white balance, picture control, tone and tone detail sub-panels can be opened at any given time. Opening another will close the previous one. The result is that while you're acclimatizing yourself, you're constantly scrolling around looking for a control that you could swear was here just a moment ago.

Thankfully, support for 4K displays and touch-screens are both decent, albeit with the same minor glitches when switching monitor resolutions as for ViewNX-i. Pen support is rather hit-and-miss, though: It works well for some things like adjusting sliders or using the retouch brush. But it has a tendency to cause problems with scrollbars located near the right of the screen, so you won't want to use a pen to navigate that lengthy Edit panel. You can't quickly tab or shift-tab to navigate between sliders, for example, leaving you reaching for the mouse or touchpad more often than should be the case.

Also, sometimes moving a slider to its limit will cause the values of other related sliders to be reset, even if you never let go of the mouse button to apply your change.

A minor annoyance, but a frustrating one if you're trying to fine-tune an adjustment near that limit. But enough of that clumsy UI; let's have some good news. Much like in NX-i, previews render in around a second or less after each adjustment, and with only a single pass required to see the final result. And just as in ViewNX-i, there's no indicator to show when the preview is updating, sadly. Given that Nikon offers two editing apps and neither offers everything provided by the other, you'll likely be switching back and forth between apps quite a bit.

Thankfully, Capture NX-D stores its adjustments in the same sidecar format as does ViewNX-i, and can also recognize edits made in that app. What this means is that you can, should you wish, stick with the more approachable of the two programs for the bulk of your editing, switching to Capture NX-D only for the more challenging edits towards the end of your editing workflow.

For those controls which are shared by the two programs, things function pretty similarly, if not always identically. I noticed some subtle variations in images processed by the pair, even if opened and converted in NX-D without any edits beyond those already made and stored in the sidecar created by NX-i.

As I said at the outset, noise reduction is beyond the scope of this comparison, and so I abstained from changing the defaults for the sample images included in this article. With that said, I still played with it a fair bit and can report that, for the camera I chose at least, even when set to "Disabled", Nikon still applies far more noise reduction than does Adobe at its default level. And ACR can be dialed back a long way beyond that point.

Another point of potential confusion — especially if you're using multiple different camera models — is that the available noise reduction controls change depending upon which camera you're using, something I didn't realize until long after I'd selected images from the Nikon Z6 for my comparisons. It turns out that some cameras — the Z6 included — allow only a four-step control over noise reduction including the kinda-sorta "off" position, with no option to fine-tune how noise is handled beyond that.

Turning to the PDF manual — which thankfully was accessible from the Help menu — set me straight. And incidentally, kudos to Nikon for making that manual easy to locate. Canon's DPP offers no help at all, and its manual a struggle to find. But I digress If your camera supports it — and Nikon doesn't state which models do — that method dropdown will give you a choice of faster, better quality, or "better quality " denoising algorithms.

Selecting one of these will give you a step intensity slider and step sharpness slider, in theory allowing you to fine-tune your noise reduction much more than the software will allow you to with Z6 raw files.

In terms of its image quality, I didn't see a significant difference between Capture NX-D and ViewNX-i, at least when using equivalent settings for the pair. ACR also had a slight edge in terms of image detail, offset somewhat by slightly stronger unsharp masking from Nikon.

But once noise reduction factored into the equation — even if "disabled" — it tended to smear away the finest details, giving ACR a bigger edge.

With LCH curves, I could target just the skin tones for reduced saturation without affecting the rest of the image. Of the two applications, there's little question that Capture NX-D offers a much richer feature set for image editing, while ViewNX-i's features feel quite limited.

If you've taken the time to read this article, NX-D is almost certainly the Nikon app you'll prefer for that task, even if its interface is a bit painful to use. With that said, I find it a bit frustrating that Nikon expects users to deal with two different apps in the first place.

As is, though, neither app feels terribly satisfying by itself, which is a shame. And as we reach the end of this article, once again I find myself preferring Adobe Camera Raw overall. Its default color might not be as pleasing, but that can be tuned to your tastes. And as well as being a bit faster and its interface much friendlier, it offers both more scope for noise reduction and better holds onto fine details in more challenging images. But if you can't afford the expense of a subscription, Capture NX-D still provides a lot of editing scope, and with pretty solid performance to boot.

In addition, NX also seems to be applying something that looks like a lens correction. Does this make sense? Come on you nit wit - why would you not focus on the capabilities of making a photo from Capture NX-D? You know very well View NX-i is mostly a quick viewing program with minor editing. See the name? So you basically made this test review rather worthless. The converter you choose has nothing to do with your success From New Zealand's iconic Milford Sound Adobe applies modest sharpening, by default I added.

If the results take a lot of wasting of time to get a better, more realistic image that the Nikon software has an advantage. Did you not look at the files in the link? Is that your idea of significant difference or should I have just dropped "almost" to avoid the possibility of a reply like yours? In a double blind test I don't think either of us could call them out and pick which converter Adobe or Nikon had made the conversion. Wow, that took 5 seconds. These are the default conversions.

They simply match, unerringly, and that's my point. The NEF opens up in both converters looking "exactly" as I have shown Next time I'll drop the qualifier.

In a commercial workflow ACR is essential for me. The Nikon software is just not nor ever has been up to speed - not even close. Couple that with the integration of ACR now as a filter in Photoshop, or for that matter, just the fact that ACR and Bridge are just portals into Photoshop, and you are at another level altogether. As a longtime Nikon shooter, raw only picture control settings are only important in one respect, consistency So, on import, I am really unconcerned with the absolute fidelity of the initial conversion.

I'm a mainstream Adobe user for also other purposes beyond Photography but have tried out many softwares including C1 and Capture NX-D. I care a lot about true detail, sharpness, noise handling and color accuracy and there it gets a complicated story.

My most recent expertise with Capture NX-D is - although you would expect the best Nikon conformity - it wasn't very compelling. There is a very decent difference in what I would describe 'overall clarity', being NX-D almost 0. The color accuracy using the Nikon standard profiles which I don't like too much, a rather prefer Adobe Color is quite close, but I'm missing a small bit of detail in NX-D compared to LR. I wouldn't know why I would disturb my proven workflow.

If I would ever consider to switch I'd rather be on the path toward C1 but to be honest, also there I'm still not fully convinced due to my own findings and can't fully adhere to the many 'wow's' I hear daily about C1. Adobe Camera Raw Con - Camera support can take a while to arrive. Not true. About 3 weeks on average. Thanks for the review.

I noticed that both Nikon products rendered the picture of the lady against the sky with a halo. I have used NX for a couple of years. No comparison because Capture One has a juicy price tag. However, if you are serious with your photos, a step up to a pro software is def worth it. Adobe has plenty of tutorials plus there are extremely competent bloggers like "Piximperfect" with great tutorials as well.

This should factor in when you compare sw solutions. Nikon has some great explanations as well and a lot of course material, but not nearly as much as Adobe, which is to be expected with a basically free editor.

Axial aberration occurs when different wavelengths of light are focused at different distances from the lens focus shift. Longitudinal aberration is typical at long focal lengths.

 


- Nikon | Download center | ViewNX 2



 

Don't think of Capture NX-D as an image-editor, think of it as a powerful dedicated raw converter for your Nikon. Nikon has ended development of Capture NX2, its premier raw conversion and editing tool.

It was a complicated but powerful program that offered the same kind of control as Photoshop though without layers. Nikon has, however, launched a new application — Capture NX-D. It's not a replacement for Capture NX2, though, because it's far less powerful. Essentially, it's a raw enhancement and batch conversion tool for Nikon cameras. It can work on JPEGs too, but the options for improving your images are more limited.

Capture NX-D offers a greater range of enhancement tools than ViewNX 2 and swaps to a more modern approach to non-destructive adjustments. These are now saved to 'sidecar' files in a folder with your original images, where ViewNX 2 wrote the adjustments directly into the file header — that's considered bad practice.

Capture NX-D has no-nonsense browsing and batch conversion tools. It's quite limited compared to other programs, but it may be enough for most of your needs. It doesn't have cataloguing tools — there's no centralised database for organising and searching through your whole photo collection, but you can browse the folders containing the photos on your hard disk, and for many photographers that's enough.

Its adjustments are stored simply as processing instructions in files stored alongside your photos. You don't have to edit and convert your images individually. Connect the camera directly to the computer; the camera may not function as expected when connected via a hub or other device. JPEG-format images Exif 2. Nikon 1 cameras beginning with the V1 and J1 released in to the V3 and J4 released in May , as well as the S2.

Download Center ViewNX 2. Send e-mail Return to the Download Center home page. ViewNX 2 Select your operating system. Windows Mac OS. Modifications enabled with Ver. This issue has been resolved. OS X version Notes Transferring files using Nikon Transfer 2: - Image transfer using Nikon Transfer 2 is not possible with the following cameras. Use a card reader to transfer images to a computer for storage. Use a card reader to transfer images.

Should this occur, disconnect the camera from the computer, turn the camera on, and then connect it to the computer again. Restrictions on Nikon Movie Editor 1. Movies up to 60 minutes in length can be edited with the Windows version; movies up to 30 minutes in length can be edited with the Mac version. The following restrictions on the number of movies and still images that can be added to the storyboard apply. Windows - A project containing up to 10 movies, or a total of 30 movies and still images, can be previewed and exported.

Mac - A project containing 4 H. However, when H. However, all other operations function properly. Images with sidecar files ViewNX 2 processes images without using sidecar files. Therefore, processing results will differ from those achieved with processing using Capture NX-D. Installation under OS X version Should this occur, please add the applications to the Dock yourself as needed. System requirements Windows Microsoft Windows 8.

Memory RAM bit Windows 8. Interface A built-in USB port is required. Turn off all virus-scanning software, exit ViewNX 2 and any other applications that may be running before proceeding with this installation.

A bit version and a bit version of this software are available for Windows operating systems. Download the appropriate file for your computer's operating system and run the file. Download the appropriate file for your operating system to your computer and run the file.

   


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sony vegas pro 13 noise reduction free

Microsoft office 2010 english language pack 32 bit free -

Microsoft office 2016 retail key free